Question 1

The terms health inequality and health inequity are related, but sometimes have a different use and may have different consequences for health promotion or health policy. These are two important concepts in public health.

Health Inequality means differences in health status or the distribution of health determinants among different demographic groups (McCartney et al., 2019). These differences are real and can be demonstrated quantitatively in a variety of health-related factors, such as life expectancy, incidence of chronic disease, access to health care, and quality of life.

Health inequalities are not always a case of 'unfairness', and often result from the complex interplay between an individual's party of genetic makeup, personal habits, social environment and exposure to the environment. For example, older people get Alzheimer's naturally more. This age-related variation in illness prevalence, a form of health inequality that is determined by the biological ageing processes.

Conversely, disparities in health that are deemed unjust and unfair, as well as avoidable and unnecessary, are expressly referred to as Health Inequity (Okoi & Bwawa, 2020). Political, social, and economic policies have a significant impact on the social, economic, and environmental conditions that give rise to these inequities.

They are both a reflection of and made worse by societal injustices such as prejudice, poverty, and limited educational opportunities. The noticeably greater incidence of cardiovascular illnesses in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities, relative to wealthy ones is an illustration of health inequity. These differences are not caused by random variation but rather by things like inadequate access to high-quality healthcare, unhygienic living conditions, and the stress brought on by marginalisation and poverty.


It is important to distinguish between these two terms. Health inequities are a subset of these disparities that are morally and ethically objectionable, whereas health inequalities can be thought of as the larger canvas representing disparities (Okoi & Bwawa, 2020). The lack of equal opportunities for every person to reach their maximum health potential, irrespective of their social, economic, or demographic background, is implied by the term health inequity.

But there is a connection between the two concepts too. To discover health inequities, one must have a thorough understanding of health inequalities. For example, systemic impediments to mental health services (inequity) such as cultural stigmatisation or a lack of affordable care can be found by looking at the unequal distribution (inequality) of mental health illnesses across different socio-economic categories.

Moreover, more than only health-specific treatments are frequently needed to overcome health disparities. It entails tackling more general social determinants of health like inequalities in income, housing, and education. Thus, policies to reduce health disparities typically include coordination between different policy areas and are inter-sectoral in nature.

Question 2

Introduction

Youth obesity is a serious problem in rural Saskatchewan, where there are particular obstacles to healthy eating such as restricted access to fresh produce and little knowledge of nutrient-dense meals. The task of getting kids between 14 and 18 to consume healthily in rural Saskatchewan is a big one and calls for a multipronged strategy. The socio-ecological model can be used to create interventions that affect people at the individual, interpersonal, organizational, communal and policy levels.

A socio-ecological model for health promotion acknowledges that behaviours about one's health are shaped by a complex interplay of factors at many different levels (Uchendu et al., 2020). It covers factors on the individual, interpersonal, community, organisational, and policy levels, making possible an integrated strategy to deal with the various factors causing young people to have bad eating habits. The long-term health effects of this strategy are more effective, and result in more permanent health benefits.
 
Figure: The socio-ecological model
(Source: Fry et al., 2022)

• Individual Level: The objective is to change young people's eating habits and awareness at the individual level. Teaching about nutrition and balanced diets and the benefits of healthy eating in the future can only be achieved by school educational programmes.
  
  Including specialized workshops and culinary classes in the curriculum can give students the knowledge they need to choose better eating options (Askren & James, 2021).
  
  So these programmes should be interesting and relevant, geared up to typical teenage problems hamburger cultures and peer pressure. Culinary competitions and nutrition-related games make learning about healthy eating a pleasing and socially rewarding experience.

• Interpersonal Level: At the interpersonal level the overwhelming influence is of friends, family, and social networks. This level of autonomy should mainly concern how families can be brought into the process of eating healthily.
  
  Nutrition seminars on the family can teach parents and carers how to prepare nutritious foods and how to encourage their children to develop good eating habits at home (Liu et al., 2021).
  
  Peer-led health promotion activities in schools and community centres can be especially effective. For instance, peer programs in which older students guide younger ones on healthier ways of eating can create a good peer environment. Through social media and online discussion boards, digital networks can be used to spread empowering messages to eat healthily.

• Organizational Level: At the organisational level, schools and local organisations are especially important. One such method is suggesting improvements to school cafeterias to serve better food.
  
  One way of doing so could be cutting out processed foods and sugar-laden beverages and adding fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and lean meats to the menu. School-based health education can also obtain more resources and assistance through cooperation with local health agencies (Kolbe, 2019).
  
  These authorities also can assist in formulating complete health policies for the schools and in planning health fairs, and can give talks on nutrition or how to live a healthy life.

• Community Level: The community level is about resources and features in the community which encourage healthy eating. A promising strategy to increase access to fresh produce is to put community gardening initiatives into practice (Wesener et al., 2020).
  
  Through these gardens young people can learn about agriculture and nutrition by doing themselves. Wholesome, fresh food can also be guaranteed by organising farmers' markets, by working with local food suppliers. Community activities and initiatives such as healthy recipe competitions or public cooking demos, can help encourage people to eat healthily and raise their awareness about how to eat well.

• Policy Level: At the policy level, interventions should try to create an environment that makes eating healthily attractive. Backing laws that require school canteens provide better eating choices can also make a big difference. For example, curbing the sale of junk food on school property or promulgating nutritious guidelines for school lunches (Kolbe, 2019).
  
  Such policies can also bring the price down and improve access to these items by awarding incentives or providing subsidies to regional producers of healthy food options. Another reason to support projects linking food education to school curricula is that it is necessary to find a way to ensure that children from an early age receive correct and consistent nutrition knowledge.
  
  Also Read - Assignment Help Sydney

Integration and Synergy

A multi-level strategy to encourage young people in rural Saskatchewan to eat healthily depends on how well activities are integrated and coordinated at different levels. Although each level—individual, interpersonal, organisational, community, and policy—plays a distinct role, their real power comes from the ways in which they support and enhance one another.

Youth who participate in individual educational programmes, for example, get information about nutrition, which is reinforced in interpersonal settings through family-friendly workshops (Askren & James, 2021). Families are included in the process and the knowledge is reinforced through these sessions, which foster a supportive home environment.

At the organisational level, schools that offer healthy cafeteria alternatives support these learning initiatives by putting the knowledge students learn into practice. Farmers' markets and gardening programmes are examples of community initiatives that support these efforts by providing more access to wholesome, fresh food (Huang, 2020). Supportive laws guarantee the long-term viability of these programmes at the policy level, fostering an atmosphere that consistently encourages the adoption of healthful eating habits.

Actions at one level will reinforce and assist actions at other levels thanks to this integrated strategy. Policy changes, for instance, can make it easier to implement nutrition programmes in schools, which in turn affects people's choices and behaviours. A thorough and coherent approach is ensured by this level of cross-level synergy, which addresses the problem from all sides and improves the overall effectiveness and sustainability of the plan.

Implementation and Collaboration

Several stakeholders must work together to implement this multi-level plan, each bringing special resources and talents to the table. Governmental organisations can finance and support policies, ensuring that programmes are both doable and in line with more general objectives for health promotion (Berwick, 2020).

Schools are essential in fostering direct interactions with young people by introducing instructional initiatives and altering the cafeteria. Health authorities can provide experience in staff training, curriculum development, and emergency medical care.

Through the facilitation of neighbourhood projects like community gardens and community activities, community-based organisations can close gaps that exist between the local community, families, and schools (Wesener et al., 2020).

Additionally, they may be extremely helpful in outreach, making sure that everyone in the community is aware of and able to utilise the programmes and resources that are offered. In order to keep the projects current and successful, input and insights from the community members themselves—especially the youth—are essential.

Monitoring and Evaluation

Monitoring and assessment are essential for identifying the success of the interventions and making the appropriate adjustments. This procedure should include both short-run and long-run performance indicators (Lundborg et al., 2022).

A selection of short-term indicators include the number of pupils taking part in nutrition education programmes, changes made to the school cafeteria menus, and the number of families taking part in family workshops.

As for long-term indicators, attitudes and knowledge about eating healthy and changes in dietary habits, including academic achievement and health outcomes such as BMI, all merit monitoring.

The results of each intervention should be appraised through regular feedback systems. This might include surveys, focus groups, and health exams. It is necessary to periodically gather and analyze the data while the results should be fed back into the actions, to further improve and fine-tune the actions.

The second advantage is that ongoing monitoring not only assists in the assessment of the effectiveness of the programme, but also ensures that the initiative remains sensitive to the changing needs of the community and adapts with the times to overcome new challenges.

Conclusion

Based on the socio-ecological paradigm, the multi-level strategy seeks to change young people's eating habits in rural Saskatchewan working to influence factors at the individual, interpersonal, organization, community, and policy level. This comprehensive plan addresses the several elements impacting eating habits and promises a major impact.

Its synergy and integration of many interventions, which emphasise cooperation between the community, government, schools, and health authorities, are its main strengths. In order to address complicated public health challenges, ensure long-lasting change, and promote a healthy future for young people, a collaborative strategy of this kind is essential.

Also Read - Torrens University Assignment Help

Question 3

Title: Navigating Health Together: Understanding and Embracing COVID-19 Vaccination in Our Community

Introduction 

Greetings to all of you! We appreciate you coming here today. I am here to discuss something that is really essential to all of us as the new Health Promotion Specialist for the Saskatchewan Health Authority: maintaining current COVID-19 vaccination records. This information is vital for the health of you and your family, regardless of how long you have been in Saskatchewan. 

Understanding Cultural Diversity 

We acknowledge the wide range of cultures represented in this room. Our varied experiences and origins contribute to the richness of our community. For this reason, we have made sure that our resources are accessible in a variety of languages and that translators are on hand to provide assistance.

Do not hesitate to seek for assistance at any moment. Recall that our goal is to make sure that on your path to improved health, each of you feels supported, listened, and understood.

Perceived Susceptibility and Severity 

Figure 2: Protective and Risk Factors of Covid-19
(Source: Zhang et al., 2023)

Let us begin by analysing the danger and seriousness of COVID-19. COVID-19 continues to pose a serious health concern despite improvements, especially to individuals who have not had the vaccination (Mohamed et al., 2022). We have witnessed first-hand in Saskatchewan how swiftly it can spread, seriously impair health, overburden our healthcare systems, and cause havoc in our daily lives. Immunization considerably lowers these dangers.

The COVID-19 vaccine has been shown to significantly reduce the risk of serious illness, hospitalization, and death, even though no vaccination is 100% effective (Kashte et al., 2021). It is critical to understand that this virus can affect anyone, especially people with underlying medical concerns and that it can have a serious effect.

Perceived Benefits of Vaccination 

 

Figure 3: Vaccination Benefits
(Source: Madad & Jetelina, 2021)

Let us now discuss the advantages of receiving a vaccination. Vaccines protect you, your loved ones, and the larger community. You greatly reduce your risk of catching COVID-19, including its several strains, by being vaccinated. More significantly, vaccination significantly lowers the risk of developing a serious illness in the unlikely event that you do catch the virus (Forman et al., 2021). You need to do this for your own health and wellbeing.

However, the advantages go beyond personal safety. Vaccination is a collective endeavour to protect public health. It helps protect those who cannot be vaccinated, such as some immunocompromised people, by enhancing the "herd immunity" effect (Mohamed et al., 2022). For disadvantaged groups, such as the elderly or those with pre-existing medical issues, who are more likely to have severe COVID-19 consequences, this communal protection is especially important.

Furthermore, a return to the things we cherish, such as community events, social gatherings, in-person education, and safe travel, is made possible by mass vaccination. Since the pandemic has had a significant impact on many facets of our lives, being vaccinated is essential to recovering them. It is about bringing back a sense of security and regularity to our day-to-day encounters and interactions.
Perceived Barriers and Addressing Them 

Figure 4: Perceived Barriers to the Vaccine
(Source: Forman et al., 2021)

We are aware that there are obstacles and worries, like adverse consequences and false information. It is normal to have concerns regarding the safety of vaccines. Generally, common side effects like as weariness, fever, or painful arm are modest and go away fast, especially when weighed against the hazards associated with COVID-19 disease (Rakusa et al., 2022). It is critical to weigh the short-term drawbacks against the long-term advantages of being protected from a possibly fatal infection.

False information may pose a serious obstacle. We stress how crucial it is to get information from reliable, scientific sources. We provide accurate, timely, and transparent information. You can ask us about any of these questions at any time.

Another obstacle might be getting to immunisation points. We also realize that in isolated or rural areas it is hard to get healthcare services. This is the problem, and attempts are being made to improve the accessibility of vaccination facilities.

To make sure that everyone gets vaccinated without being restricted by logistical barriers, this includes mobile vaccination clinics, community-based vaccination drives and collaborations with local organizations.

Cue to Action 

What action can you take next? Keep yourself informed about the locations and times for vaccinations. The Saskatchewan Health Authority maintains up-to-date information about vaccination locations and schedules on its website. Additionally, we have pamphlets and fliers with all the pertinent information present today. Recall that maintaining your immunisations current is a continuous effort, particularly when new vaccine variations appear and booster doses become accessible.

Self-Efficacy 

We aim to provide you the tools you need to make wise decisions about your family's and your own health. You are taking preventative action for your health by getting vaccinated. We are here to help you every step of the way, so you are not alone in this.

And a large number of people in your neighbourhood have already done so. You will feel encouraged and reassured about the wise decision you're making after hearing about their experiences.

Interactive Component 

Let us now invite questions from the public. This is your chance to ask questions and express any concerns you may have. Accurate answers can be obtained from the medical professionals present. Tell us if speaking in your original tongue makes you feel more at ease, and one of our interpreters will be happy to help.

Conclusion and Follow-Up 

I would want to thank everyone for coming today and for their involvement. Recall that maintaining your COVID-19 immunisations current is essential to maintaining your safety as well as the safety of our community. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you need help or if you have any more questions. With education, self-assurance, and teamwork, we can get through these difficult times together. We are here to help.

Evaluation (Appendix 1)

Please take a moment to fill out the feedback forms. We greatly value your feedback in order to enhance our work and provide better services to the community. Thank you!

Question 4

Although they are closely related, health promotion and health education are two key ideas in public health that have different purposes and areas of application.

Giving people the tools they need to take charge of their health and make improvements to it is the comprehensive practice of health promotion (Nutbeam & Muscat, 2021). It includes a broad spectrum of social and environmental interventions intended to prevent and address the underlying causes of illness rather than only concentrating on its treatment and cure, in order to improve and safeguard each person's health and quality of life.

The goal of health promotion initiatives is to provide people and communities the power to make healthy decisions and lifestyle adjustments that will lower their risk of chronic illness and other morbidities. Health promotion means laws that help make the air cleaner, walks and parks which let people exercise body and soul to stay in shape, campaigns for better eating habits.

Health education, on the other hand, involves training people and communities in health matters. It involves sharing information with or communicating it to them so as to change their attitude or raise awareness (Stormacq et al., 2019).

Health promotion is one area of health education. Health education nurtures a deeper understanding of health issues, and the capacities to make sound health decisions and undertake lasting behavioural change. For example, a diabetic education programme can teach patients how to control the disease, such as how to test their blood sugar level and how to observe a certain diet.

Comparison and Contrast: While the objectives of health promoting and health education are similar, in that they both aim to promote health and resist illness, their methods and fields of application are different. Health education is mainly about giving knowledge and abilities; health promotion is quite comprehensive and involves a whole series of social and ecological techniques.

Health promotion is aimed at creating environments in which health can be promoted through community-based or policy-driven activities. It is preventive in that it strives to change the environmental and social determinants of health. By contrast, health education often directs attention at changing individual attitudes and behaviours by providing information and instruction.

Illustration: Take smoking as an example. A health promotion strategy seeks to lessen smoking by backing laws that ban tobacco advertising, impose special taxes on tobacco products or prohibit smoking in public places. These initiatives deal with the larger social and environmental factors that influence smoking behaviour.

Alternatively, a health education strategy would involve a campaign making clear the dangers of smoking, the benefits of quitting, and the existence of resources for quitting programmes. This strategy puts more emphasis on the individual knowledge and judgment.

Question 5

Introduction

Establishing a MASH group on Vancouver's downtown eastside is a response to the urgent need for peer-to-peer assistance during the process of recovery from substance abuse.

Given the size of the Indigenous population, this region which is so renowned for its problems with substance abuse needs to be the focus of targeted interventions. In this vein, MASH emphasizes the special needs and cultural conditions of the Aboriginal people. The group aims to become a place to help those abstaining or abstinent provide assistance and encouragement to one another.

• Understanding the Community Needs: There are also special problems with drug abuse that are quite specific to aboriginal people, who are often hindered by systemic obstacles; past abuse and shock; and cultural alienation.
  
  As Hagle et al. (2021) point out, part of this demographic's high rate of substance use problems reflects larger social and historical injustices and is a health concern in itself. In order for assistance to be effective and in order that the recovery process be in settings sensitive to cultural identity and experience, there has to be a deep understanding and acknowledgement of these unique characteristics.

• Key Features of MASH Programs: Peer-led support groups with a focus on mutual help and shared experiences, MASH programmes promote health and recovery (Von Pressentin et al., 2020). These programmes are necessary for health promotion and substance use recovery, because they provide a place that is safe and accepting where people who face similar problems can interact, share experiences and offer support to one another.
  
  These are characteristics such as peer support, a sense of belonging, shared responsibility and group empowerment. The point about this approach is that it provides a way forward to healing and growth which is culturally relevant and enriching, and at the same time strengthens communal ties and individual recovery.

• Group Leadership: Fundamentally, it depends on the leadership of a MASH group. But for group leaders or facilitators who are in recovery or have long-term abstinence, lived experience with substance use should be a high priority (Chen et al., 2023).
  
  This lived experience fosters credibility, empathy, and understanding. In addition, since the group is mostly Aboriginal in makeup, leaders should give preference to those with Aboriginal roots, either by blood or long association. This relationship ensures relevance and cultural competence.The selection can also be based on community nominations or self-nominations.
  
  This will be followed by a process of careful scrutiny in which the individuals' ability to lead, understanding of Indigenous traditions or concept of a recovery path will be taken into consideration. Group facilitation, conflict resolution, and cultural awareness must also be trained in some leaders.

• Group Formation and Membership: The first step in forming the MASH group is to approach possible members through several channels using a strategic recruitment approach. Therefore, we have to work with neighbourhood community centres, hospitals, and social service providers (and those that provide services for the Aboriginal population and the drug-addicted) (MacKinnon et al., 2022).
  
  It needs to include a clear recruitment message, a firm commitment to inclusivity and respect for each individual's own recovery process, and the power of shared experiences. It should be announced through flyers, posters, and digital media. In order to maintain openness, these resources and outreach must be multi-lingual, culturally sensitive, and reflective of the different backgrounds of the members of the community.
  
  Establishing the group's norms, expectations, and available support system is included in welcoming new members. During this phase, the group's basic principles and confidentiality guidelines may be outlined, success stories may be shared, and meeting procedures may be explained (MacKinnon et al., 2022).
  
  Frequent open meetings can be planned to accommodate ongoing admission of new members and guarantee that the group stays open to everyone, maybe with a special monthly session reserved for newcomers.

• Meeting Logistics: Choosing an appropriate location for a group meeting has a big influence on attendance. In order to guarantee that no member is left out owing to a lack of transportation, the places should be conveniently accessible by public transportation (Tang & Liao, 2021). Spaces inside Indigenous organisations, community centres, or cultural centres are ideal because they are safe and have a friendly attitude.
  
  These locations, which are well-known and revered in the neighbourhood, can support the development of a feeling of safety and inclusion.Meeting length and frequency should be carefully considered. Weekly sessions, which run between one and two hours, balance honouring participants' schedule responsibilities with offering constant, continuous support.
  
  Because of the different schedules of the group participants, the meeting schedule should be flexible, perhaps every other day or time. This flexibility means that the group is a usable and accessible support mechanism for each and every one of its members.

• Cultural Sensitivity and Inclusiveness: Moreover, cultural sensitivity should go hand in hand with the use of traditional Indigenous healing techniques (Brown & Di Lallo, 2020). This could mean smudging ceremonies, inviting elders to speak or starting meetings with traditional prayers. These activities help the healing process by establishing cultural contacts and providing a spiritual milieu.
  
  A setting that is friendly, polite and safe is important to create. Group rules which ensure confidentiality, encourage active listening, and discourage judgement must be established if this is to be achieved. In order for the group to be successful and last, every participant, at whatever stage of recovery or cultural background, needs to be able to feel that he or she has been heard and respected. In particular, group members provide constant feedback on the cultural appropriateness and responsiveness of the sessions, which helps the group refine and improve its methodology.

• Advocacy and Support Role: Providing more than just a helping hand, I become a spokesperson and advocate for the MASH groups' needs and goals. And that basically means making contact with the nearest health services (World Health Organization, 2021). Another aspect is obtaining funds to continue and expand the group's operations. It could range from contacting potential sponsors to planning fundraising activities to applying for grants.
  
  Another key ingredient is raising awareness--by working with local media, or going into the community, and kicking off a social media campaign that presents the aims and achievements of the organization. The group's effectiveness and outreach will increase with the establishment of community alliances, which will provide supplemental resources and personnel, particularly in the form of Indigenous organisations and leaders.

• Monitoring and Evaluation: A comprehensive evaluation system incorporating both qualitative and quantitative indicators will be used to determine the MASH group's effectiveness. It will be necessary to conduct occasional feedback surveys to determine members 'satisfaction, feelings of support and self-growth.
  
  Retention rates, participation rates, and attendance rates all provide quantitative data on commitment and involvement. Furthermore, periodic feedback with the group leaders and participating health professionals will provide great insight into the group dynamics and point to ways of developing the group in future (Rousseau & ten Have, 2022). A continuing feedback system will allow the programme to change and adapt to changing needs.

• Long-term Sustainability: The MASH group's long-term survival requires a multi-pronged strategy. Stable, continuous funding is a must, and funding sources might include gathering various government grants, local contributions, and prospective sponsorships.
  
  A good base of community support, particularly within the Indigenous community, will help the group maintain competitiveness and cultural orientation and provide a stable base of resources (Richmond et al., 2021).
  
  Group facilitators must receive continuing training and education in order to keep up with current knowledge and skills in terms of group facilitation, cultural sensitivity, and drug use recovery techniques. Establishing such an alumni network of former participants and long-term members, as mentors for new members, can also help to ensure the group's resilience.

Conclusion

The MASH group plan, paying special attention to the needs of the Indigenous community of Vancouver's downtown eastside, outlines an effective plan for abstinence and recovery from substance use.

The organization offers a valuable and significant resource for those pursuing recovery with strong monitoring and assessment, long-term sustainability strategies and successful advocacy. The organization's capacity to continue providing a key support network for people seeking long-term sobriety and wellbeing depends on its ability to stay culturally aware, flexible, and a part of the community it serves. 

 

Top Healthcare Samples

References

Askren, J., & James, W. (2021). Experiential learning methods in culinary course can bridge the gap: Student perceptions on how hands-on curriculum prepares them for industry. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 33(2), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2020.1791134 
Berwick, D. M. (2020). The moral determinants of health. Jama, 324(3), 225-226. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.11129
Brown, M. A., & Di Lallo, S. (2020). Talking circles: A culturally responsive evaluation practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 41(3), 367-383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214019899164 
Chen, Y., Yuan, Y., & Reed, B. G. (2023). Experiences of peer work in drug use service settings: a systematic review of qualitative evidence. International Journal of Drug Policy, 120, 104182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.104182 
Forman, R., Shah, S., Jeurissen, P., Jit, M., & Mossialos, E. (2021). COVID-19 vaccine challenges: What have we learned so far and what remains to be done?. Health policy, 125(5), 553-567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.03.013 
Fry, J. P., Stodden, B., Brace, A. M., & Laestadius, L. I. (2022). A Tale of Two Urgent Food System Challenges: Comparative Analysis of Approaches to Reduce High-Meat Diets and Wasted Food as Covered in US Newspapers. Sustainability, 14(19), 12083. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141912083 
Hagle, H. N., Martin, M., Winograd, R., Merlin, J., Finnell, D. S., Bratberg, J. P., ... & Lum, P. J. (2021). Article Commentary: Dismantling Racism Against Black, Indigenous, and People of Color across the Substance use Continuum: A Position Statement of the Association for Multidisciplinary Education and Research in Substance use and Addiction. Substance abuse, 42(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897077.2020.1867288 
Huang, N. (2020). The Healthy Incentives Program: Perspectives from Lawrence, Massachusetts (Doctoral dissertation, Tufts University). https://search.proquest.com/openview/30fb56a5f89efde850234f8ae991395d/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750&diss=y 
Kashte, S., Gulbake, A., El-Amin III, S. F., & Gupta, A. (2021). COVID-19 vaccines: rapid development, implications, challenges and future prospects. Human cell, 34(3), 711-733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13577-021-00512-4 
Kolbe, L. J. (2019). School health as a strategy to improve both public health and education. Annual review of public health, 40, 443-463. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218-043727 
Liu, K. S., Chen, J. Y., Ng, M. Y., Yeung, M. H., Bedford, L. E., & Lam, C. L. (2021). How does the family influence adolescent eating habits in terms of knowledge, attitudes and practices? A global systematic review of qualitative studies. Nutrients, 13(11), 3717. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu13113717 
Lundborg, P., Rooth, D. O., & Alex-Petersen, J. (2022). Long-term effects of childhood nutrition: evidence from a school lunch reform. The Review of Economic Studies, 89(2), 876-908. https://academic.oup.com/restud/advance-article-pdf/doi/10.1093/restud/rdab028/42748235/rdab028.pdf 
MacKinnon, L., Kerman, N., Socías, M. E., Brar, R., & Bardwell, G. (2022). Primary care embedded within permanent supportive housing for people who use substances: a qualitative study examining healthcare access in Vancouver, Canada. Health & Social Care in the Community, 30(6), e5062-e5073. https://doi.org/10.1111/hsc.13921 
Madad, S., &  Jetelina, K. (2021). Positive impact of covid19 vaccines at the individual and population level. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/positive-impact-covid19-vaccines-individual-and-population-level 
McCartney, G., Popham, F., McMaster, R., & Cumbers, A. (2019). Defining health and health inequalities. Public health, 172, 22-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2019.03.023 
Mohamed, K., Rzymski, P., Islam, M. S., Makuku, R., Mushtaq, A., Khan, A., ... & Rezaei, N. (2022). COVID‐19 vaccinations: the unknowns, challenges, and hopes. Journal of medical virology, 94(4), 1336-1349. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.27487 
Nutbeam, D., & Muscat, D. M. (2021). Health promotion glossary 2021. Health Promotion International, 36(6), 1578-1598. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa157 
Okoi, O., & Bwawa, T. (2020). How health inequality affect responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Sub-Saharan Africa. World development, 135, 105067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2020.105067 
Rakusa, M., Öztürk, S., Moro, E., Helbok, R., Bassetti, C. L., Beghi, E., ... & European Academy of Neurology NeuroCOVID‐19 Task Force. (2022). COVID‐19 vaccination hesitancy among people with chronic neurological disorders: a position paper. European journal of neurology, 29(8), 2163-2172. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.15368 
Richmond, C., Kerr, R. B., Neufeld, H., Steckley, M., Wilson, K., & Dokis, B. (2021). Supporting food security for Indigenous families through the restoration of Indigenous foodways. The Canadian Geographer/Le Géographe Canadien, 65(1), 97-109. https://doi.org/10.1111/cag.12677 
Rousseau, D. M., & ten Have, S. (2022). Evidence-based change management. Organizational Dynamics, 51(3), 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2022.100899 
Stormacq, C., Van den Broucke, S., & Wosinski, J. (2019). Does health literacy mediate the relationship between socioeconomic status and health disparities? Integrative review. Health promotion international, 34(5), e1-e17. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/day062 
Tang, M., & Liao, H. (2021). From conventional group decision making to large-scale group decision making: What are the challenges and how to meet them in big data era? A state-of-the-art survey. Omega, 100, 102141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102141 
Uchendu, C., Windle, R., & Blake, H. (2020). Perceived facilitators and barriers to nigerian nurses’ engagement in health promoting behaviors: a socio-ecological model approach. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(4), 1314. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041314 
Von Pressentin, K. B., Besigye, I., Mash, R., & Malan, Z. (2020). The state of family medicine training programmes within the primary care and family medicine education network. African Journal of Primary Health Care & Family Medicine, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.4102%2Fphcfm.v12i1.2588 
Wesener, A., Fox-Kämper, R., Sondermann, M., & Münderlein, D. (2020). Placemaking in action: Factors that support or obstruct the development of urban community gardens. Sustainability, 12(2), 657. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020657 
World Health Organization. (2021). Guidance on community mental health services: promoting person-centred and rights-based approaches. https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/341648/9789240025707-eng.pdf 
Zhang, J. J., Dong, X., Liu, G. H., & Gao, Y. D. (2023). Risk and protective factors for COVID-19 morbidity, severity, and mortality. Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology, 64(1), 90-107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-022-08921-5